Bonjour,
j’aimerai savoir si la technologie HDX 3D est compatible sur un environnement XenApp?
Merci d’avance
"http://support.citrix.com/article/ctx122818" wrote:
This document applies to:
XenDesktop 3.0 x32
http://hdx.citrix.com/hdx-3d
ouaip mais bon c’est pareil, c’est pour XenDesktop quoi 
sniff :’( oui et je ne trouve pas de date pour XA sur les roadmap
C’est only pour xendesktop sur une machine physique windows XP 32 bits (beta 64bits) avec une carte nvidia serie quadro ou presque !
"chavers" wrote:
sniff :'( oui et je ne trouve pas de date pour XA sur les roadmap
Sinon un Webinar interessant : https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/600275905
"Stef_Activlan" wrote:
XenApp 6 sortira avec HDX pour XenApp (Flash et USB dynamic plug au moins)
Oui ok mais la 3D, projet apollo!
"http://community.citrix.com/display/ocb/2009/04/16/WS08+Boosts+Direct3D+App+Performance" wrote:
WS08 Boosts Direct3D App Performance
If you have a Direct3D based application that consumes a lot of CPU running on Windows Server 2003, consider hosting it on XenApp 5 for Windows Server 2008. The reason? Under WS08, Direct3D apps can take advantage of graphics processing hardware on the server to do the graphics rendering. As a result, you'll likely find that you can provide better performance to your users and increase the number of concurrent users per server compared to using software rendering (see my earlier blog post). The one key limitation is that the apps must run in 16-bit (5-6-5) color mode ("High color") since the solution does not currently support 24-bit or 32-bit color. Also, running on a hypervisor is not yet possible, until the hypervisor and graphics vendors introduce GPU virtualization technology.
DirectX hardware acceleration can be used together with the Progressive Display feature of HDX 3D. One customer recently commented that the bandwidth requirement to deliver a particular Direct3D graphics application with good performance using these technologies was 1.5 Mbps for the first user plus 0.5 Mbps for each successive user. This has made XenApp a very attractive platform for delivering the application to their remote users.
Derek Thorslund
Product Strategist, HDX Multimedia Virtualization
If you have a Direct3D based application that consumes a lot of CPU running on Windows Server 2003, consider hosting it on XenApp 5 for Windows Server 2008. The reason? Under WS08, Direct3D apps can take advantage of graphics processing hardware on the server to do the graphics rendering. As a result, you'll likely find that you can provide better performance to your users and increase the number of concurrent users per server compared to using software rendering (see my earlier blog post). The one key limitation is that the apps must run in 16-bit (5-6-5) color mode ("High color") since the solution does not currently support 24-bit or 32-bit color. Also, running on a hypervisor is not yet possible, until the hypervisor and graphics vendors introduce GPU virtualization technology.
DirectX hardware acceleration can be used together with the Progressive Display feature of HDX 3D. One customer recently commented that the bandwidth requirement to deliver a particular Direct3D graphics application with good performance using these technologies was 1.5 Mbps for the first user plus 0.5 Mbps for each successive user. This has made XenApp a very attractive platform for delivering the application to their remote users.
Derek Thorslund
Product Strategist, HDX Multimedia Virtualization
yes, mais moi je suis comme Saint Thomas, je ne crois que ce que je vois
Donc HDX flash et USB hot plug yes, le reste j’attend de voir
D’après ce que j’ai compris, la partie 3D telle qu’elle est porté dans xendesktop ne devrait pas se retrouver dans Xenapp, car cette techno vient de xenapp, voire même d’un dev sur PS 3.0 pour boeing.
Cela à été abandonné sur xenapp car la gestion de IO par l’OS même en 64 bits était un goulot d’étranglement et puis da…ault ne voulait plus en entendre parler…